playbook:radical_autonomy_feedback_loops

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

playbook:radical_autonomy_feedback_loops [2025/12/08 03:15] – created marcelplaybook:radical_autonomy_feedback_loops [Unknown date] (current) – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Feedback Loops for Radical Autonomy ====== 
- 
-Radical autonomy requires deliberate feedback architectures to prevent drift, misalignment, or silent failure. The following loops form the minimal viable system for autonomy to scale across teams. 
- 
-===== 1. Role Clarity & Outcome Feedback ===== 
-  * **Mandate Pages**: Each role maintains a living document outlining: 
-    * Core outcomes, not just tasks 
-    * Decision authority boundaries 
-    * Dependencies and interfaces 
-  * **Autonomy Scorecard** (monthly or quarterly self-assessment): 
-    * Progress on outcomes 
-    * System-building contributions 
-    * Peer collaboration signals 
-    * Radical honesty (e.g., raised misalignments) 
- 
-===== 2. Peer-to-Peer Feedback ===== 
-  * **Weekly Micro-Retrospectives**: 
-    * What I did 
-    * What slowed me down 
-    * What I need from others 
-  * **Sociocratic Rounds**: 
-    * Check-ins where each team member shares status/tensions in turn 
-    * No direct responses unless explicitly requested 
- 
-===== 3. Systems Health Visibility ===== 
-  * **Live Dashboards or Logs**: 
-    * SOP coverage 
-    * Blocker resolution velocity 
-    * Documentation and postmortem trails 
-  * **Departmental Maturity Reviews** (quarterly): 
-    * Clarity of roles 
-    * Process readiness 
-    * Delegation maturity 
-    * Cross-functional alignment 
- 
-===== 4. Architect Meta-Feedback ===== 
-  * **Weekly ARCH Ritual**: 
-    * Reflect on agency, clarity, results, and system health across org 
-  * **Delegation Signal Review**: 
-    * Did delegated projects scale? 
-    * Were tensions surfaced *before* escalation? 
-    * Did outcomes improve the system? 
- 
-===== 5. Knowledge Contribution & Decay Tracking ===== 
-  * **DokuWiki as Knowledge Ledger**: 
-    * Roles document lessons, assumptions, and system changes 
-  * **Decay Alerts**: 
-    * Auto-flag SOPs or role pages untouched beyond X days/weeks 
- 
-===== 6. Tooling Friction Signals ===== 
-  * **Friction Logs** (embedded or linked in tools): 
-    * Time lost, unclear paths, broken workflows 
-  * **Monthly Pulse Check**: 
-    * Trust, clarity, and speed ratings on internal tools 
- 
-===== 7. Intent Visibility & Decision Logs ===== 
-  * **Decision Log Format**: 
-    * Who decided 
-    * Why (context and tradeoffs) 
-    * Implications 
-    * Review date 
-  * **Quarterly Decision Revisit**: 
-    * Are assumptions still valid? 
-    * Were outcomes as expected? 
- 
-===== 8. Tension Escalation & Integration ===== 
-  * **Open Tension Channels** (chat or wiki): 
-    * Named or anonymous 
-    * Reviewed weekly 
-  * **Proposal Loops**: 
-    * Tension → Proposal → Integration review (consent or iteration) 
- 
-===== Optional: Micro-feedback Mechanisms ===== 
-  * Live role reflections in meetings 
-  * Shadow logs for self-accountability 
-  * Bi-directional peer coaching protocols 
- 
-===== Maintenance Notes ===== 
-  * Each feedback loop should be reviewed semi-annually for: 
-    * Relevance 
-    * Participation quality 
-    * Friction or misuse 
-  * Loops are modular—adopt progressively but review as a system.